Abstract: Provoked by the need to denounce summer reading packets claiming to hold kids accountable, I found myself thinking about my third grade students, and that, of course, led to Jack Prelutsky, definitely an informational writer.
Some years back, it didn’t take the Common Core imperative to make me antagonistic to education solutions. I think I subscribed to ReadWorks.org: The Solution to Reading Comprehension simply because of their audacity of putting The Solution in their name.
I’ll skip the rant about that other group that claimed they had the Final Solution.
There Are No Rules
Oliver Sacks offers this conclusion at the end of his memoir, On the Move: A Life: There are no rules, there is no prescribed path. . . .[W]e are destined, whether we wish it or not, to a life of particularity and self-development, to make our own individual paths through life.
Of course, this is what good teaching is about: A life of particularity. Particular, individual kids experimenting to find their own particular, individual paths.
ReadWorks worked at convincing teachers to send home reading packets for kids’ summer reading. They explained this about the content: “This model uses research to identify the words and phonics knowledge that students need to succeed at particular grade levels. These critical words are repeated often in SummerReads”
ReadWorks promised that their summer packets, complete with informational reading passages, guidelines, and forms for students to fill out, would prevent summer slump.
For example, kids would read:
*Kinds of Melons
*Fun with Melons
*Rating your thinking and reading
For each grade level, each text set is seven pages long and includes five pictures in full color.
Math Question: How much would it cost to print seven text sets for a class of twenty-five students?
Misery Question: How much fun time skateboarding, climbing trees, cooking–and reading real books–will kids have to forfeit? How much family agony will result from Mom and Dad nagging kids into slogging through the 49 pages?
If this material entered any student’s home, I hope parents tossed it where it belonged–in the trash–and took their kids to the library.
Here are the funders who backed this message It is important that students are held accountable for their summer reading.
Brooke Astor Fund for New York City Education
Frances L. & Edwin L. Cummings Memorial Fund
Cleveland H. Dodge Foundation
Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
William R. Kenan, Jr. Charitable Trust
Leon Lowenstein Foundation, Inc.
NewSchools Venture Fund
Smith Richardson Foundation
Tsunami Foundation – Anson and Debra Beard, Jr. and Family
Now we are bombarded by headlines about the current reading crisis:
*Children lose basic skills under virus
*Reading skills of young students stalled during pandemic
*Children regress in basic skills
Schools are asked to step up and be accountable. The reality is that it’s long past time for society to be be accountable by providing all families with a living wage and all children access to lots of books.
Lots of books that they choose for themselves.
Instead of filling classrooms with pages and pages of artificial text adhering to a readability formula and accompanied by low-level recall questions, funders who care about kids should sponsor backpacks filled with free books of the children’s choice.
I can testify from first-hand experience that children make good choices when given the chance. When I won a Scholastic contest giving me 100 free books, the company sent me a list of “programs” I could choose from.
“Oh, no,” I told them. “My third graders are going to choose from the catalogue–one book at a time.” I requested three catalogues.
My students, segregated as the 20 worst readers in our school’s third grade, kids whose official emotional and learning difficulties stretched longer than my arm, just about wore out those catalogues examining titles, arguing over which to order. Each child was given three picks: two for himself and one for the classroom library. I chose the rest. I had inspired/encouraged/browbeat those kids who started the year as “rotten readers” (Dick Allington’s very accurate term) to start each class day with silent reading–books of their own choice. They fought hard against this plan at first but by January they were complaining when I called a halt to silent reading at the end of an hour.
Yes, an hour. And invariably when I bring this up in talks, teachers ask, “But if they spent an hour in silent reading, when did you teach?”
I haven’t yet inflicted any wounds on people asking this question.
Discovering Amelia Bedelia
Jennifer discovered Amelia in December. By that time the children’s period of independent silent reading had extended from the initial torturous time of five minutes to forty minutes which I’d call obedient but not enthusiastic. Yes, I read, too, and my principal learned he could not stop by for a chat during this sacred time. (Ask yourself: How often have your students seen adults reading? Students watching me read during this time was a critical part of the enterprise)
I knew the instant Jennifer discovered something startling in Amelia Bedelia. Her eyes opened wide; she turned back a page and read it again, mouthing each word. Then she giggled and looked up at me. I nodded and winked. She grinned an nudged Sophie, showing her the page. Then David demanded to see what was so funny, and before he realized what was happening, David, the boy who whined the loudest every single morning, “I hate reading!” was enjoying a book. Before long, 20 rotten readers were scrambling to get their names on a waiting list for, of all things, a book. Then Jesse discovered that there were more Amelias in the library, and we had an Amelia celebration.
It was a celebration of reading. We didn’t use the book as an excuse to do something else. I didn’t interrogate them about main idea; they didn’t make puppets. Each book was an inspiration to read another book. I was appalled a few years later to discover Amelia in a basal. The accompanying teacher’s manual carefully listed the objectives to be taught with the story, including: decode words based on the spelling pattern generalization that a vowel letter followed by a consonant and final e represents a glided (or long) vowel sound.
Never mind that research shows that the final e rule holds true no more than 53% of the time.
What we need to remember is that “the skills” are in the reading and are acquired by reading and more reading, not by doing worksheets.
Now, in the name of rigor, Amelia Bedelia’s First Field Trip is moved to the fourth week of kindergarten, where they spend three days in a close reading of the story.The teacher reads the story aloud and then asks 27 questions.
Then comes the Culminating Assignment:
Read, Think, Discuss, Write
1. Think about the story, Amelia Bedelia. Turn to your partner and tell something new that you learned.
Now turn to your partner and tell your favorite part of the story.
Discuss the things that Amelia’s class experienced in order. (Use the powerpoint as a source of information if necessary.)
Have each student to draw a picture of their favorite part. Encourage the students to write about their favorite part of the story.
2. Compare and Contrast Miss Bindergarten Takes a Field Trip and Amelia Bedelia’s First Field Trip: Name of Story, Transportation, Setting, Characters, Activities During Field Trip.
1. Ask a student to volunteer to be traced on brown butcher paper. This will now be Amelia Bedelia.
In groups make clothes for Amelia Bedelia.
Retell the story to Amelia Bedelia.
2. Have each student identify something new they learned. Draw a picture of this new knowledge.
Everyone in the education universe seems to have jumped on making Amelia Bedelia Common Core-operative. Here’s NCTE and IRA in ReadWriteThink
Amelia Bedelia Up Close! Closely Reading a Classic Story
With the adoption of the Common Core State Standards and its emphasis on complex texts, students need opportunities to read closely and engage in deep thinking. After reading Amelia Bedelia by Peggy Parish, students discuss text-dependent questions to promote an understanding of the story’s character. Through subsequent readings, they construct and support arguments concerning the character traits of Amelia Bedelia and use the text to determine how Amelia Bedelia and the Rogers can have different reactions to the same events. After these discussions, students demonstrate their understanding of character by completing a trading card for Amelia Bedelia.
Trading Card Creator: When using this resource, students answer questions about a character in their text, allowing them to demonstrate their understanding of how the character develops throughout the story.
Amelia Bedelia by Peggy Parish: Amelia Bedelia is the focus text for this close reading due to its qualitative complexity, which is the result of its use of words with multiple meanings, requiring students to use their prior knowledge to understand the content. . . .
There’s more offal…lots more.
Third Graders Choose
By Spring, when I handed my students the Scholastic catalogue, they were ready for it. They consulted each other; they worried over/argued over their picks for more than a week. And their choices were stellar.
I’d put my third graders up against any book selection committee in the country.
Note that at the core of ReadWorks offers the promise that every skills delivery system offers: This model uses research to identify the words and phonics knowledge that students need to succeed at particular grade levels. These critical words are repeated often….
This is the corporate version of particularity: The critical words for success at particular grade levels. I envision future teacher exams: Name the words 3rd graders need for success!
In rebuttal, I offer Jack Prelutsky, another favorite of my 3rd graders. David, mentioned above as the kid who was louder than anybody else about how much he hated reading, hid Prelutsky books so he could always access them. David wrote Jack a letter–and received a personal, handwritten reply that reverberated in the community. But that’s another story. . . .
For the argument here, take a look at a few “critical words” from Tyronnosaurus Was a Beast by Jack Prelutsky:
Coelophysis was a hunter. . .
and its legs were fast and strong.
Coelophysis chewed on lizards,
Coelophysis swallowed ants,
Coelophysis gnawed on mammals,
but it never dined on plants. . . .
From Wikipedia: Coelophysis was a bipedal, carnivorous, theropod dinosaur that was a fast and agile runner.
As if you needed proof that Jack Prelutsky is a great writer of informational text who captures kids’ interest and enthusiasm without resorting to syllable-counting formulas.
Of course, plenty of my third graders didn’t give a fig about dinosaurs. They found their reading fun–and information–in a multitude of other books.
Particularity makes the world go round
As a coda, I commend Arnold Lobel’s lovely little fable, “The Crocodile in the Bedroom” (in Fables) to the teacher who feels she must be in control–of the skills, the books, and the children:
A crocodile who loved the neat and tidy rows of the flowers on the wallpaper in his bedroom was coaxed outside in the garden by his wife, who invited him to smell the roses and the lilies of the valley.
“Great heavens!” cried the crocodile. “The flowers and leaves in this garden are growing in a terrible tangle! They are all scattered!
They are messy and entwined!” Whereupon he went back to his room, seldom laving his bed.
He stared at the neat and tidy rows of flowers on the wallpaper and “he turned a very pale and sickly shade of green.”
I entreat teachers to remember that Lobel’s moral, Without a doubt, there is such a thing as too much order, applies as much to school curriculum as it does to wallpaper. It goes hand-in-hand with Oliver Sacks’ worldview:
[W]e are destined, whether we wish it or not, to a life of particularity and self-development, to make our own individual paths through life.
— On the Move: A Life
That “we” includes doctors, lawyers, Indian chiefs, politicos, teachers. . . and third graders.